Saturday, 22 November 2008
NRV Community Information
Blacksburg News and Events
Christiansburg News and Events
Floyd County News and Events
Giles County News and Events
Montgomery County News and Events
New River Valley News and Events
Pulaski County News and Events
Radford News and Events
Virginia Tech News and Events
Everything Christiansburg
Christiansburg Citizen Information Page
Christiansburg News
Christiansburg Archives
Community Resources/Organizations
Christiansburg Events
Community Map
Christiansburg in Pictures
Weather
Wi-Fi Hotspots
Christiansburg Resources

Online Video Christiansburg

 

Town of Cburg

Town of Christiansburg

 

 

Christiansburg PD

Christiansburg Police Department

 

 

Cburg fire dept

Christiansburg Fire Department

 

 

Cburg Rescue

Christiansburg Rescue Squad

 

 

Cburg Parks

Christiansburg Parks and Recreation

 

 

Google Ads
 
Christiansburg Parking Issue Faces Council Print E-mail
Leigh Anne Correll   

The Christiansburg Town Council met Tuesday night for their regular meeting in Town Hall chambers. First up on the agenda was a presentation of new Christiansburg Police Department members.

“I firmly believe we [the Christiansburg Police Department] are one of the strongest agencies in Virginia,” said Christiansburg Police Department Chief Mark Sisson.

Due mostly in part to their recruitment standards, Chief Sisson says the force and staff that police the Christiansburg area are among the best. He introduced five additional employees in front of council:  Gary Seagraves, Maureen Dietrich, Brandy Smith, Tina Mays and Jackie Steelwell. A short background of each individual was presented by Chief Sisson. Mayor Richard Ballengee told the new members that council wishes for their success. A short recess was taken for proper introduction.

During the public address, Christiansburg citizen Lisa Gardner stepped to the podium. She utilized an available drawing board to illustrate her comments as she discussed her concerns about parking in the downtown area. She discussed an ongoing problem of courthouse patrons taking up downtown parking for hours, thus limiting the availability of space to people who wish to visit businesses in the area.

Not only did Gardner point out issues that are experienced by many businesses and visitors to downtown, she also suggested a solution: parking should be limited to 30 minutes at the Post Office, one hour along Franklin and at the Antique shop and two hours along Main Street.

“Most people don't spend more time than one hour in the businesses located on Franklin and at the Antique shop,” Gardner said. “[...] Along Main Street there are places like Macado's and the Sapphire Ballroom and Dance Studio that might take a little more time.”

Councilmen Brad Stipes and Dan Canada spoke next, citing a place on the agenda for discussion of the parking situation. The last Town Council meeting brought the issue to their attention and a parking committee was formed to discuss solutions. They had a meeting earlier in the evening that was open to the public.

As a result of interviews with business owners downtown – and as to not interfere with the 'welcoming nature' of the area – it was decided there would be no parking meters. It was agreed, however, after reviewing data collected by the committee and by a parking survey conducted by Christiansburg citizen Carol Lindstrom, that there should be limitations on parking.

It was pointed out that parking in the Post Office area was already limited by the business to approximately 15 minutes. Therefore, the areas left for consideration were along Franklin, in front of StellarOne bank, in the small semi-circle area in front of the Antique store and along Main Street.

Councilment Stipes and Canada recommended that Council install signs that limit parking times in all aforementioned areas to two hours. Keeping in the spirit of beautifying the downtown area, it was suggested that the signs, themselves, be attractive and un-abrasive.

Chief Mark Sisson had discussed with the parking committee an increase of foot patrol downtown upon the acceptance of the two hour parking limit. The foot patrol would decrease fuel usage, increase officer involvement and familiarity with the community and it would also help monitor parking.

The two hour limitation was discussed and passed by council, with the stipulation that the parking committee will continue to review, research and observe parking situations in the area. The parking committee recognizes there are certain burdened areas that may need further limitations. Council will allow for revision to the parking structure upon discovery of additional need.

The new limitations are set to go in place on September 1, 2008, after proper notification has taken place and a fine for parking violations has been determined.

“There's nothing more helpless than a man sitting in a barbershop chair, getting a haircut and watching a police officer outside writing a ticket for his car,” said Mayor Ballengee.

Comments (2)Add Comment
Christiansburg Issues
written by citizen, July 03, 2008
Correction to prior post by Citizen: It was South Franklin St., not North Franklin, on which the lawnmower operator was cited just a few days ago(no "poor driving," DUI, etc., involved.)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Parking Issues Face Council (and new emloyees, etc.)
written by citizen, July 02, 2008
Parking in Christiansburg: Citizens are trying to be pro-active, RE: parking. However, the new courthouse will only add to the problem, hence an expensive parking garage is proposed (hasn't been mentioned, as of late). It would cost about $50k for an officer(s) to regulate parking, counting all benefits, etc. (I realize a 1st-year policeman doesn't make $50k.) Even though coverage might rotate, the fact is, it would take one officer all day to regulate parking. I've rarely had a problem finding a space; sure, court-dates are a little tight. Let's avoid the "barbershop" syndrome, which I thought was a great analogy by Mayor Ballengee. Avoid another expenditure, via police/parking. With the proposed parking garage, let alone maintenance, their would be security problems, hence, more policing costs; garages are known to be crime scenes more often than open-space areas. I'm not the "judge," but I know that there has to be a better place to put the new courthouse instead of downtown. No dirt has been "turned"..change the plan. For instance, the 10 acres on Farmview Road (across Rt. 460 from Sheetz) would not have to be sculptured, as did the mountain-side Aquatics Center area that has virtualy NO parking; busing is proposed. It all ties together: Courthouse: new: no parking; build parking garage. Acquatics Center: no parking: busing and proliferation of local immediate access parking problems (it's walking distance from the "meterless" parking streets.) The demise of the meters, not counting the manpower to monitor, take money, maintain equipment, was great. Now, some folks are complaining, and while they have tried to make good suggestions, I think the best is to "leave it alone." Relocate the courthouse, hence, no parking "pork-barrel" garage would be needed; still could relocate the Aquatics Center (It's not THAT far along, except for mountains of dirt moved, and a frame. The 10-acre site on Farmview would alleviate most all problems and give more equal access to County residents (it's centrally located, and has major highway connections in-place); courthouse and Aquatics should be there...more than enough room. Just the cost of the parking garage would pay for much of the land (I know that the original price for the 10 acres was about $1 million (including separate parcels that are now unified.) The recent purchase by the town for $600K (corner of Roanoke/First St.) would have been better spent on "open range." Retailers would have had more downtown space, also. The expenditure of sculpting the hillside of the "no parking" Aquatics Center,the proposed parking garage cost (along with access roads, etc.), along with the $600K for Roanoke St. site, would more than paid for the Farmview site. It's not too late to fix the parking problems for decades, if only logic would be used. It's sad: hard-earned tax-payer money being squandered, as it adds to the original problem: downtown parking. It seems the "Big Picture" is being missed, as arguments about the "Little Picture" take minds away from the realities we will be facing, including extreme traffic problems, let alone parking. Finally: 5 new employees introduced: if they are additional employees, with a police force of over 50 officers, already, thanks a lot. Christiansburg's population does not support that number of personnel; taxes will continue to rise. Who's is charge? Is there no comprehensive plan. Please, the "Big Picture" should not be ignored. Stop piecing-together projects that proliferate problems. There seems to be NO coordination. Just look at just one horrific intersection at the "Rec" center: death defying (the Town had input with VDOT)...much of the traffic to the courthouse, and proposed Aquatics Center has to pass through that section. That's just one example of awful decisions that seem to be happily continuing, at the expense and suffering of the people. Apparently, not "by the people, for the people"...for the "pork-barrel."
Well, I guess I'd better watch out: I don't want a ticket for anything in Christiansburg, such as for riding a lawn-mower on North Franklin St., as one guy received just the other day. Serious infractions like that should have major agencies involved, a SWAT team should have been called.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
First Thing in the Morning on WFNR 710 AM